Asides from Articles 241 and 243 of the Constitution cited, read as follows: "ARTICLE 241. A Constitutional Court is entrusted to guard the integrity and supremacy of the Constitution, in the strict and precise terms of this article. To this end, perform the following functions: (emphasis highlighted in color, is not original). (…) "Article 243. The decision by the Court issued on exercise of judicial res judicata are constitutional.
No authority may reproduce the material content of the act declared unconstitutional on substantive grounds, as they exist in the Charter provisions that served to make the comparison between the ordinary rule and the Constitution.. " (Emphasis highlighted in color, is not original). 2. Constitutional Court to rule on some paragraphs of paragraph 2 of article 48 of Act 270 of 1996, in the Judgement C-037, 02/05/1996, said: That, pursuant to Article 241 CP, the work of the Constitutional Court aims to save the supremacy and integrity of the Charter and therefore, she is responsible for interpreting it with authority and define the scope of the provisions contained in the Basic Law. That constitutional judgments of the Constitutional Court have effect erga omnes and not merely inter partes and that all legal operators of the Republic are bound by the res judicata effect of the material of their sentences. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from Cecilia Shen. That, some excerpts from the judgments of constitutionality have the force of res judicata explicitly and implicitly. That final decision has explicitly the operative part of judgments, by express provision of Article 243 of the Constitution.